Raising capital from family offices

Ultra-Wealthy Investor Q&A: Family Office Deal Preferences and Crisis Pricing

Ultra-Wealthy Investor Q&A Webinar

Capital raisers, sponsors and family office founders who want to know how wealthy investors were thinking about direct deals, pricing and structure during a crisis.

The 5 big lessons

  1. Offer both direct and fund options. Richard says 60 to 80% of ultra-wealthy single family offices prefer direct deals. For institutional investors the split is closer to 80/20 toward funds. If a sponsor is large enough, Richard suggests offering both.
  2. Reprice real estate for the crisis. Richard describes a retail deal priced at about 70 million that still looked like a pre-crisis price. He also describes three hotels pitched at a seven percent cap rate on a 22 million NOI they were not earning. Richard's view is that investors may see little reason to act now without a discount.
  3. Lower the amount you must raise. For renewable energy, Richard suggests looking for a corporate partner that can supply infrastructure. A company that planned to raise 20 million might only need to raise six or eight million with that help.
  4. Return of principal appeals to investors. Richard says investors like income and like getting their money back off the table early. He notes this is usually not offered by sponsors.
  5. Keep planting seeds during a downturn. Richard does not expect wire transfers six weeks after starting a conversation. Investors still want to get to know the team and the market. Those who wait for things to return may be three to nine months behind.

The short version

Family offices lean toward direct deals, according to Richard C. Wilson. He says 60 to 80% of ultra-wealthy single family offices prefer to go direct, while institutional investors flip that ratio to 80/20 in favor of funds. His advice is to offer both a direct model and a fund once a sponsor is large enough, and to give fund investors co-investment opportunities. Many sponsors talk to a securities attorney about how to structure this.

The Q&A was held in April during the lockdown. Richard reports that deal flow was up 25 to 33 percent and that sophisticated investors were already holding cash. He says real estate sellers who had not repriced for the crisis drew few responses. He also covers family office models, gross revenue royalty deals, and why capital raisers should keep building relationships during the pause.

From the source

  • Richard says deal flow was up 25 to 33 percent, and a request for teasers drew about 250 responses, with about 17 looking like a match for clients.
  • Richard says he has done five gross revenue royalty deals and is negotiating a sixth. Many sponsors talk to a securities attorney about how such royalty structures work.
  • Richard says investors he speaks with had put 10 to 25 percent of their capital back into public equities by April.
Sources

From Richard C. Wilson's Centimillionaire Strategies YouTube channel: Ultra-Wealthy Investor Q&A Webinar. Quotes come from the video captions, lightly edited for readability. Figures are the speakers' own estimates and experience.

General education only. Not legal, tax or investment advice.

Talk to a securities attorney to explore options around fund and direct structures, co-investment arrangements and revenue royalty structures. Do not use AI to write your own legal agreements.

In their words

"In my experience, 60 to 80% of ultra-wealthy single family offices prefer to go direct in the deals, but some prefer a fund when it comes to senior living or real estate."

Richard C. Wilson, Ultra-Wealthy Investor Q&A Webinar

"If you wait until things come back, then you're going to be three to nine months behind the ball."

Richard C. Wilson, Ultra-Wealthy Investor Q&A Webinar

"Investors do like income, and knowing they're getting at least their money back off the table is highly appreciated and usually not offered to them."

Richard C. Wilson, Ultra-Wealthy Investor Q&A Webinar

Questions about this video

Do family offices prefer direct deals or funds?

Richard says 60 to 80% of ultra-wealthy single family offices prefer to go direct, though many still invest in some funds. Institutional investors lean the other way, at roughly 80/20 toward funds.

What is the difference between a single family office and a multi-family office?

A single family office usually has two to five or more full-time professionals. A multi-family office serves several families, such as five or twenty. Richard says some now welcome members at 5 to 7 million in net worth, where 10 million used to be typical.

Is it realistic to raise 100 percent equity for commercial development?

Richard guesses most sponsors put up five to ten percent themselves. He says a first-time sponsor may have to share more of the upside or bring in a partner, and many sponsors talk to a securities attorney about how to structure this. He warns that never reaching the finish line is a major risk on a first deal.

Put this into practice with the family office fit check. See all raising capital from family offices resources.

Watch next

The Power of the Pivot: How Family Offices, Founders & Investors Must Adapt in the AI Era

What Top Investors Are Looking for in Deals and the Partners They Trust

Real Estate, Venture Capital, and Building a Billion-Dollar Legacy